Skip to main content

My PhD thesis

With 42 days to go until I have to submit my PhD thesis, I haven't really had much time to blog...let alone draw dinosaurs! All I have time for is to get stressed out.

Anyway, in the midst of all this, I've finally decided on a thesis title:

Bite force, and the evolution of feeding function in birds, dinosaurs and cats.

The perfect title to show just how much unfocused my thesis is when it comes to a taxonomic group of interest, but extremely obsessed with bite force...ha! Of course it may be subject to change.

The actual thesis consists of five chapters:

Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Myology and functional morphology of extant archosaurs
Chapter 3: Reconstruction of the jaw adductor muscles and jaw biomechanics in dinosaurs
Chapter 4: Dry skull bite force estimation in felids
Chapter 5: Tracing the evolution of bite force in Darwin’s finches and felids

Chapter 1 introduces biomechanical concepts regarding bite force and also introduces bite force as a useful single-value indicator of feeding function. So Chapter 1 is theory-heavy.

Chapter 2 is pretty much a preparation chapter for Chapter 3 and is dominated by straightforward muscle descriptions in extant archosaurs but primarily birds. Special focus is given to the Herring Gull/Lesser Black-backed Gull complex (Larus argentatus/L. fuscus), Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) and Domestic Chicken (Gallus domesticus) but also feature the Ostrich (Struthio camelus) and other assorted birds. But perhaps the most important thing about this chapter is the data collection of cross-sectional areas of muscles for muscle force estimation.

Chapter 3 deals with jaw muscle reconstructions and bite force estimations in dinosaurs, in particular theropods. A simple method of bite force estimation is discussed and bite force is then predicted in a wide range of theropod taxa which is then used to test evolutionary hypotheses regarding feeding adaptations...

Chapter 4 is a critical reinvestigation into the Dry Skull method using extant and extinct cats. Bite force is estimated in 38 extant species of felids plus 3 extinct cats (Miracinonyx trumani, Panthera atrox, and Smilodon fatalis).

Chapter 5 takes the bite forces estimated for cats in Chapter 4 and uses a phylogenetic comparative method to test evolutionary hypotheses. Data in Darwin's finches are also analysed in the same way, mostly for the historical significance of finches in the development of evolutionary theories but also because there are plenty of data available for Darwin't finches in the literature. I gave a talk at PalAss last December on a priliminary version of this chapter.

There is also a summary and conclusions section at the end to wrap it all up.

So in summary, my thesis is really about bite force estimation methods and practical uses of bite force in evolutionary analyses...the evolution of functional adaptations intrigues me to no end and I believe that bite force is a strong tool in analysing functional adaptations regarding feeding.

Comments

Jerry D. Harris said…
Anyway, in the midst of all this, I've finally decided on a thesis title:

Bite force, and the evolution of feeding function in birds, dinosaurs and cats.


Uh...if I may be very presumptuous here for a moment, that title should be:

Bite force and the evolution of feeding function in birds, dinosaurs, and cats.

No comma after "force" and a comma after "dinosaurs."

The perfect title to show just how much unfocused my thesis is when it comes to a taxonomic group of interest

That's not a big deal and I wouldn't worry about it -- as dissertation topics become more and more transdisciplinary, it's increasingly necessary to broaden one or more research scopes (e.g., taxa, approaches, disciplines, etc.) in order to answer interesting questions; trying to accommodate all that under a single banner -- which, really, only a dissertation would ask anyone to do anymore...! -- necessitates titles like yours that seem excessively broad but actually do a great job of depicting the actual content.
Mambo-Bob said…
Ah - cheers! I'll change the title as suggested. Thank you very much.

And I'm grateful for your encouragements. I need all the support I can get right now;)
Traumador said…
Good luck with finishing it and the defence. I look forward to good news when you're done
Manabu Sakamoto said…
Thanks, Traumador!

Incidentally, I'm using LaTeX so thankfully, I don't really have to worry too much about formatting...phew
Julia said…
I suppose there is a perfectly good explanation but I know the dino birds connection but why cats?
Manabu Sakamoto said…
Hi Julia,

The main reason I got into cats was because I helped supervise a masters project on a Smilodon specimen that we have in our Department. That project compared Smilodon with Tiger and Lion (skull specimens that we also happened to have) and I just extended that by collecting data for as many cat species as I can get a hold of. Mammalian skulls are to some extent easier to work with, and there are plenty of previous studies to cross-check my results with. Further, cats are relatively conservative in morphology yet diverse enough in subtle differences. So they're quite the ideal group to test for within-lineage adaptations and stuff like that. At least that's what I think anyway. Comparative functional morphology is my primarily interest, so the choice of animal group is in a way just the means to an end.
Zach said…
That's f*cking awesome, brother! Good luck on your defense. I'd love to read the paper when all's said and done. I didn't realize you were going for your PhD--I'm gonna have to start calling you "Doctor" now. :-)

And if I ever go about trying to write up that spinosaur post from way back when for publication, I might come knocking for bite force studies! :-D
Julia said…
It sounds really interesting so I'll be checking for updates from time to time.

BTW I have a blog too and thought it could be nice to exchange links or guest post
Manabu Sakamoto said…
Hi Zach,

Hahaha, I'm not a doctor yet...

and don't hesitate to ask me for any bite force related stuff when you start with your manuscript!

Julia,

I'll get on with the link!
Manabu Sakamoto said…
umm....where's your blog, Julia?
Malacoda said…
This is a bit late, but I disagree with Jerry slightly on the title. As you are in the UK, speaking and writing 'English' English, the list of taxa should not have a comma after dinosaurs. Jerry is correct if you are writing in 'American English'.
Manabu Sakamoto said…
So that's the confusion, eh? I didn't think it was a UK vs US English thing and started doubting my own memory...good to know.
Anonymous said…
Well, it was good that you have plan head what is the content of your thesis paper. That way, it would be easy for you to organize all the information you need and put them in a place that they belong. It would also help avoid mistake that sometimes are the cause of revising the paper again and again.

Popular posts from this blog

R for beginners and intermediate users 3: plotting with colours

For my third post on my R tutorials for beginners and intermediate users, I shall finally touch on the subject matter that prompted me to start these tutorials - plotting with group structures in colour.

If you are familiar with R, then you may have noticed that assigning group structure is not all that straightforward. You can have a dataset that may have a column specifically for group structure such as this:

B0 B1 B2 Family
Acrocanthosaurus 0.308 -0.00329 3.28E-05 Allosauroidea
Allosaurus 0.302 -0.00285 2.04E-05 Allosauroidea
Archaeopteryx 0.142 -0.000871 2.98E-06 Aves
Bambiraptor 0.182 -0.00161 1.10E-05 Dromaeosauridae
Baryonychid 0.189 -0.00238 2.20E-05 Basal_Tetanurae
Carcharodontosaurus 0.369 -0.00502 5.82E-05 Allosauroidea
Carnotaurus 0.312 -0.00324 2.94E-05 Neoceratosauria
Ceratosaurus 0.377 -0.00522 6.07E-05 Neoceratosauria
Citipati 0.278 -0.00119 5.08E-06 Oviraptorosauria
Coelophysi…

The difference between Lion and Tiger skulls

A quick divergence from my usual dinosaurs, and I shall talk about big cats today. This is because to my greatest delight, I had discovered today a wonderful book. It is called The Felidæ of Rancho La Brea (Merriam and Stock 1932, Carnegie Institution of Washington publication, no. 422). As the title suggests it goes into details of felids from the Rancho La Brea, in particular Smilodon californicus (probably synonymous with S. fatalis), but also the American Cave Lion, Panthera atrox. The book is full of detailed descriptions, numerous measurements and beautiful figures. However, what really got me excited was, in their description and comparative anatomy of P. atrox, Merriam and Stock (1932) provide identification criteria for the Lion and Tiger, a translation of the one devised by the French palaeontologist Marcelin Boule in 1906. I have forever been looking for a set of rules for identifying lions and tigers and ultimately had to come up with a set of my own with a lot of help fro…

R for beginners and intermediate users: reading and manipulating data

I had been preparing a comprehensive tutorial on how to plot in R (The R Project) with different groups differentiated in different colours, but Blogger stupidly erased my post and decided to automatically save my empty draft at that precise moment. Since I cannot reproduce the original post, I decided to break it up into a series of smaller topics.
There are plenty of R resources available in various places but I found that they are frequently one of two extremes; either too basic or too advanced.  I think of myself as an intermediate user (i.e., I can comfortably handle canned packages but want a bit more control than the default settings allow) so the type of info I find are not too helpful. So I thought it would benefit others like me if I summed up some of the simple things I learned over the last year or two.
As a first of such posts, I will deal with reading in and manipulating data.  These may be very simple and basic, but some of the things I wanted to do required a bit more th…