Skip to main content

Why did Jurassic World hire a former Navy Seal to train their raptors?

The title says it all...

But to reiterate:

Why did Jurassic World, supposedly the world's biggest theme park, hire a former Navy Seal to train their velociraptors?

Could they not attract the top expertise in animal training? Or any of the surviving Jurassic Park veterans?

Or was Owen Grady THE top raptor trainer in the world?

I am confused.

I liked Owen Grady as a character; he was funny and charismatic. And I enjoyed Chris Pratt's portrayal of Grady. But suspension of disbelief went flying out the window as soon as he was revealed to be a former Navy Seal and not Steve Irwin...


Craig Dylke said…
I personlly jokingly interpreted it as a Navy Seal trainer :P

I opted to imagine he had a jaded background training Dolphins or some sort of animal for military...

In a way I can kind of see why a hardened combat vet might be handy to have in proximity to hyper murderous monsters like the fictional Raptors... him as the head trainer/handler was very odd. All they needed was to make him a former navy animal trainer, and it would have made perfect sense.

I actually didn't hate that there were no palaeontologists on staff. It kind of makes sense. However I would have expected the head of the parks operations (Dallas) to have a little enthusasim for the "assets".
Raptor's Nest said…
Maybe her character was a criticism of modern corporate career execs? You know, the type that gets hired to manage the company as professional managers or directors? - ahem, not to mention University heads nowadays?

I doubt those people have enthusiasm for or understanding of their products...
FossilJockey MG said…
His Jurassic World wiki profile states he trained dolphins previously.
Did we forget: Thats why they hired him.... to train warfighters:
"Look, Nature gave us the perfect killing machine, 75 million years ago and now we know they can take orders.... " paraphrase. That whole conversation explains why hire a SEAL

Popular posts from this blog

R for beginners and intermediate users 3: plotting with colours

For my third post on my R tutorials for beginners and intermediate users, I shall finally touch on the subject matter that prompted me to start these tutorials - plotting with group structures in colour.

If you are familiar with R, then you may have noticed that assigning group structure is not all that straightforward. You can have a dataset that may have a column specifically for group structure such as this:

B0 B1 B2 Family
Acrocanthosaurus 0.308 -0.00329 3.28E-05 Allosauroidea
Allosaurus 0.302 -0.00285 2.04E-05 Allosauroidea
Archaeopteryx 0.142 -0.000871 2.98E-06 Aves
Bambiraptor 0.182 -0.00161 1.10E-05 Dromaeosauridae
Baryonychid 0.189 -0.00238 2.20E-05 Basal_Tetanurae
Carcharodontosaurus 0.369 -0.00502 5.82E-05 Allosauroidea
Carnotaurus 0.312 -0.00324 2.94E-05 Neoceratosauria
Ceratosaurus 0.377 -0.00522 6.07E-05 Neoceratosauria
Citipati 0.278 -0.00119 5.08E-06 Oviraptorosauria

The difference between Lion and Tiger skulls

A quick divergence from my usual dinosaurs, and I shall talk about big cats today. This is because to my greatest delight, I had discovered today a wonderful book. It is called The Felidæ of Rancho La Brea (Merriam and Stock 1932, Carnegie Institution of Washington publication, no. 422). As the title suggests it goes into details of felids from the Rancho La Brea, in particular Smilodon californicus (probably synonymous with S. fatalis), but also the American Cave Lion, Panthera atrox. The book is full of detailed descriptions, numerous measurements and beautiful figures. However, what really got me excited was, in their description and comparative anatomy of P. atrox, Merriam and Stock (1932) provide identification criteria for the Lion and Tiger, a translation of the one devised by the French palaeontologist Marcelin Boule in 1906. I have forever been looking for a set of rules for identifying lions and tigers and ultimately had to come up with a set of my own with a lot of help fro…

The fundamental problem with the Star Wars franchise

The sequel Star Wars Trilogy (so far Episodes VII and VIII) has been getting a lot of hate on the internet. While I think most of the hatred is just dreadful and ridiculous (like “Social Justice Warriors” taking over and making Star Wars too diverse and featuring too many strong female characters? Get out of here!), there are some legitimate criticisms, that I can relate to.

One such criticism is, that the new trilogy (especially The Last Jedi) effectively undoes the ending of The Return of the Jedi - in some ways rendering the struggles and sacrifices of the Rebel Alliance meaningless. As a viewer who watched the original trilogy conclude with the death of the Emperor, I presumed that the Empire came to an end, and with it the end of tyranny. I presumed that democracy would be reinstated in the form of a New Republic and the reconstruction of a New Jedi Order with Jedi Master Luke Skywalker at the helm. Peace is restored and all is good. I think that’s a nice ending.

But then the new S…