Skip to main content

Albertaceratops nesmoi MK II

Albertaceratops nesmoi MK II! It looks a lot better than my previous one, which is way too embarassing to link to now... You may have noticed but I am having fun with all these ceratopsians. It seems like I'm stuck in a ceratopsian phase right now...

I can't really comment much on Albertaceratops other than what's already been covered elsewhere. I don't think there's really anything done with this dinosaur other than the original description. But then again, what is there to do with a dinosaur known from a single skull and some fragments? Ah - someone should do functional morphology, like FEA - provided they have access to a huge scanner, that is... Not just in Albertaceratops but someone should look into stress distribution patterns in ceratopsian crania using FEA. Better yet, someone should look at pachycephalosaurs...

Anyway, I think it's the new paper but the pencil just came out too dark...and it started getting smudged so I couldn't really add any more to this. I am not liking this new paper at all...


Zach said…
Damn interweb won't let me read about Albertaceratops without plunking down like $25. If you have the paper, could you send it my way?

On the other hand, you're right, I've seen pictures of the skull, and it's pretty fragmentary. I'm actually MORE interested (as you've probably gathered) in Kirkland's "Octoceratops," which I'm beginning to think will never see the light of publication.

I'd like to see your take on Alaska's favorite centrosaurine, brother: Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis (Traumador would like it too, I think), perhaps?
Traumador said…
Zach you're very right. I've always had a soft spot for Pachyrhinos.

Though this Albertaceratops drawing is awesome, and the want for a Pachyrhino is not a commetary on this drawing Manabu.

All me and Zach are of course getting at is the more the better ;p
Being inspired by the recent wave of ceratopsian stuff over here I took a look through my Tyrrell photos and came up with a couple shots of the Pipestone Creek Pachyrhinos.

I've put them up at my blog:

Sadly I only have one good shot with multiple specimens in it. The pachy age series was packed away and all over the place when I had a mere 30 minutes access to the Tyrrell's collection, and of course wanting pictures of a LOT of other things I only managed to track down the jaws (around minute 28/30 as I recall!).

Anyways loving the drawings their sweet!

I'm checking with Darren Tanke if he can get me anymore pics or info on the Pipestone Creek material.
Mambo-Bob said…
Thanks guys:)

I will have to scrounge up some references for Pachyrhinosaurus, that should be my next ceratopsian!
Peter Bond said…
Wow, I've been finding your blog through Traumador's and I have to say wow! Your dinosaur pencil drawings are very good and I look forward to seeing more!

Popular posts from this blog

R for beginners and intermediate users 3: plotting with colours

For my third post on my R tutorials for beginners and intermediate users, I shall finally touch on the subject matter that prompted me to start these tutorials - plotting with group structures in colour.

If you are familiar with R, then you may have noticed that assigning group structure is not all that straightforward. You can have a dataset that may have a column specifically for group structure such as this:

B0 B1 B2 Family
Acrocanthosaurus 0.308 -0.00329 3.28E-05 Allosauroidea
Allosaurus 0.302 -0.00285 2.04E-05 Allosauroidea
Archaeopteryx 0.142 -0.000871 2.98E-06 Aves
Bambiraptor 0.182 -0.00161 1.10E-05 Dromaeosauridae
Baryonychid 0.189 -0.00238 2.20E-05 Basal_Tetanurae
Carcharodontosaurus 0.369 -0.00502 5.82E-05 Allosauroidea
Carnotaurus 0.312 -0.00324 2.94E-05 Neoceratosauria
Ceratosaurus 0.377 -0.00522 6.07E-05 Neoceratosauria
Citipati 0.278 -0.00119 5.08E-06 Oviraptorosauria

The difference between Lion and Tiger skulls

A quick divergence from my usual dinosaurs, and I shall talk about big cats today. This is because to my greatest delight, I had discovered today a wonderful book. It is called The Felidæ of Rancho La Brea (Merriam and Stock 1932, Carnegie Institution of Washington publication, no. 422). As the title suggests it goes into details of felids from the Rancho La Brea, in particular Smilodon californicus (probably synonymous with S. fatalis), but also the American Cave Lion, Panthera atrox. The book is full of detailed descriptions, numerous measurements and beautiful figures. However, what really got me excited was, in their description and comparative anatomy of P. atrox, Merriam and Stock (1932) provide identification criteria for the Lion and Tiger, a translation of the one devised by the French palaeontologist Marcelin Boule in 1906. I have forever been looking for a set of rules for identifying lions and tigers and ultimately had to come up with a set of my own with a lot of help fro…

Top 10 scientifically important theropod dinosaurs of all time (off the top of my head)

I thought I'd do a fun post for once. And since list based articles are the norm for fun on the internet, I thought I'd do one on dinosaurs, but given that I know most about theropods, I've decided to restrict my list to theropods (...maybe in a future post, I'll do other clades).

My ranking is based mostly on scientific importance so it may not reflect awesomeness, and it is obviously subjective as to how I rank importance to science. For instance, interesting discoveries or unique palaeobiology are ranked relatively low compared to wealth of information and data or completely revolutionising our understanding of the evolution of theropods.

So here are my top 10 scientifically important theropod dinosaurs of all time (off the top of my head)

10. Megalosaurus

Being the first dinosaur to be named, Megalosaurus automatically deserves a spot on this list, but given the fragmentary nature of known fossil specimens, and being mostly useless as a meaningful source for biologi…