Skip to main content

Albertaceratops nesmoi

This is my attempt at Albertaceratops nesmoi. This is pretty my first attempt at a ceratopsian as well...

The plate-like epidermal structure on the face is purely speculation on my part.

Albertaceratops is yet another one of those interesting centrosaurine with a blade-like nasal 'horn' or ridge, but with postorbital horns that are very large for a centrosaurine.

If ceratopsians locked their horns in intraspecific combat, then Albertaceratops must have had a fairly similar style of combat with Triceratops and other long-horned chasmosaurines - perhaps???


traumador said…
Awesome work.

I'm a sucker for Albertoceratops. I worked at the Tyrrell for the 3 years they were preping it, and it's been cool to see how it went from the slightly interesting "Dinosaur Park Pachyrhino" to a huge international palaeo star when Dr. Ryan choose the new name and published it.

It's just too bad their attempt to find the frill didn't turn anything up (except a partial turtle shell).
Turtle shell, eh? That's hilarious! But then, they do look very similar, turtle shells and centrosaurine frills:)
traumador said…
It was a tiny turtle sadly... Or they would have had something to sick on the back end of his head indeed LOL

It's an interesting skeleton all round. I can't remember if Dr. Ryan's description went into detail on it or not, but this is as palaeo-pathologic a skeleton as you can get.

The poor Albertaceratops had some sort of major infection of it's feet that had rooted the toes while animal was still alive! Darren Tanke is studying it further, and probably publishing something on it soonish (if he hasn't already). He suspects something to do with really aggresive fungus.

Anyways loving your blog, and your drawings are awesome!
Zach said…
Good stuff, and Albertaceratops is one of the more interesting centrosaurines. You know, because it has long brow horns and no nasal horn.
It seems similar to Jim Kirkland's unnamed centrosaurine, which I called "octoceratops" back on the original blog. Brow horns, two small nasal horns, and large jugal horns (like Pentaceratops). From what I read, it also came out as a basal centrosaurine.
Good drawing, though. Great detail on the head, and I'm glad to see you gave it "semi-sprawling" forelimbs, which is what the current research suggests.

Popular posts from this blog

The difference between Lion and Tiger skulls

A quick divergence from my usual dinosaurs, and I shall talk about big cats today. This is because to my greatest delight, I had discovered today a wonderful book. It is called The Felidæ of Rancho La Brea (Merriam and Stock 1932, Carnegie Institution of Washington publication, no. 422). As the title suggests it goes into details of felids from the Rancho La Brea, in particular Smilodon californicus (probably synonymous with S. fatalis ), but also the American Cave Lion, Panthera atrox . The book is full of detailed descriptions, numerous measurements and beautiful figures. However, what really got me excited was, in their description and comparative anatomy of P. atrox , Merriam and Stock (1932) provide identification criteria for the Lion and Tiger, a translation of the one devised by the French palaeontologist Marcelin Boule in 1906. I have forever been looking for a set of rules for identifying lions and tigers and ultimately had to come up with a set of my own with a lot of help

R for beginners and intermediate users 3: plotting with colours

For my third post on my R tutorials for beginners and intermediate users, I shall finally touch on the subject matter that prompted me to start these tutorials - plotting with group structures in colour. If you are familiar with R, then you may have noticed that assigning group structure is not all that straightforward. You can have a dataset that may have a column specifically for group structure such as this: B0 B1 B2 Family Acrocanthosaurus 0.308 -0.00329 3.28E-05 Allosauroidea Allosaurus 0.302 -0.00285 2.04E-05 Allosauroidea Archaeopteryx 0.142 -0.000871 2.98E-06 Aves Bambiraptor 0.182 -0.00161 1.10E-05 Dromaeosauridae Baryonychid 0.189 -0.00238 2.20E-05 Basal_Tetanurae Carcharodontosaurus 0.369 -0.00502 5.82E-05 Allosauroidea Carnotaurus 0.312 -0.00324 2.94E-05 Neoceratosauria Ceratosaurus 0.377 -0.00522 6.07E-05 Neoceratosauria Citipati 0.278 -0.00119 5.08E-06 Ovir

Hind limb proportions do not support the validity of Nanotyrannus

While it was not the main focus of their paper, Persons and Currie (2016) , in a recent paper in Scientific Reports hinted at the possibility of Nanotyrannus lancensis being a valid taxon distinct from Tyrannosaurus rex , using deviations from a regression model of lower leg length on femur length. Similar to encephalisation quotients , Persons and Currie devised a score (cursorial-limb-proportion; CLP) based on the difference between the observed lower leg length and the predicted lower leg length (from a regression model) expressed as a percentage of the observed value. The idea behind this is pretty simple in that if the observed lower leg length value is higher than that predicted for its size (femur length), then that taxon gets a high CLP score. I don't particularly like this sort of data characterisation (a straightforward regression [albeit with phylogeny, e.g. pGLS] would do the job well), but nonetheless, Persons and Currie found that when applied to Nanotyrannus , it